1 Assistant Professor, Nanjing Forestry University, the Cooperative Innovation Center of Southern Modern Forestry,, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Corresponding author details:
Ali Movahedi, Assistant Professor
The Cooperative Innovation Center of Southern Modern Forestry
Nanjing Forestry University
© 2018 Movahedi A, et al. This
is an open-access article distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
international License, which permits unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original author and source
The advantage of CRISPR genome editing is not limited to only its cost, but it is easy
to use in any lab with molecular biology expertise. On the other hand, CRISPR does not
need to protein engineering for targeting each gene, while TALE and ZF nucleases are
needed. CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing system needs only a DNA construct to encode the
target specific gRNA and Cas9 in one expression vector. Furthermore, CRISPR-Cas9 can
edit multiple genome with homolog sequencing simultaneously, resulting in increasing the
CRISPR; Genome editing
Trans-activating crRNA (tracrRNA) is one motif that is necessary to recruit the Cas9 nuclease complex and direct it to the target sequence, using the guide RNA (gRNA) including target recognition sequence. In addition, one CRISPR-Cas9 needs to detect target with the Protospacer Adjacent Motif (PAM), which is defined as NGG or etc. CRISPR-Cas9 enables to excise 3 to 4 nucleotides of the upstream of the PAM motif. On the other hand, inside the cells there exist some repair pathways for DNA, which will be activated with Double-stranded breaks (DSB) on target sequencing. In CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing there are two ways for starting edition: 1) Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ) that enables to insert or delete nucleotides or fragment randomly, at the site of repair on target sequencing, leading to suppress the gene with no longer expression and cause to knock-out. 2) The Homologous Recombination (HR) sequences cause to integrate DNA or knock-in to the DSB sites, leading to make precise mutation on the target genes.
TALENs, ZFNs and CRISPR-Cas9
There are some differences and advantages between TALENs (transcription activatorlike effector nucleases), ZFNs (zinc finger nucleases) and CRISPR-Cas9, which are the best double-stranded DNA break genome editing technologies. Regarding with the targets, TALENs will target both proteins and DNAs such as ZFNs, but unlike CRISPR-Cas9 that target only DNAs using one guide RNA (gRNA). In addition, regarding to the construct of them shows ZFNs bind to the motifs in a ββα configurations and also, detect 3 bp of DNA α-helix region. TALENs recognize the specific base pair sequences of the DNA, whereas CRISPRCas9 that recognize target only with 20 nucleotides crRNA (CRISPR RNA) attached to tracrRNA (Transcription CRISPR RNA) and Cas9 endonucleases to detect specific base pair sequences, which is termed PAM. Although, TALENs and ZFNs need to customize protein for editing each gene sequences, CRISPR-Cas9 needs only one expression vector including gRNA-Cas9 construct, and enables to multigenes editing simultaneously. Purification of genomic DNA is necessary to investigate of chromosomes including chromatin-associated RNAs and proteins. According to the Gilbert et al., modification of CRISPR-Cas9 allows us to edit genome in multiple targets . This is possible to add one trackable tag and one molecular localization signal (NLS) into inactive or dead Cas9 (dCas9) to create a bind between proteins and DNAs for targeting by guide RNA (gRNA) . Using of databases is required to design gRNA for targeting genes and avoiding of increasing off-targets.
CRISPR-Cas9 and epigenetic
Epigenetic modifications have been always to play very important roles in biological
processes via influence on genomic DNA at specific loci and histone proteins. Cytosine
methylation and acetylation are most important of epigenetic modification that affect
on gene expression. These days, CRISPR-Cas9 is considered to genome editing for these
epigenetic spots. Liao et al. reported that presented three active methyltransferases
in embryonic stem cells of human, can be knocked-out by CRISPRCas9 to indicate usable, capable of giving rise to several different cell
types on the DNA methylation .
We welcome all readers to prepare articles in plant genome editing
by CRISPR-Cas9 for submitting to Methods of Microbiology and
Molecular Biology journal.
1. Gilbert LA, Larson MH, Morsut L, Liu Z, Brar GA. CRISPRmediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell. 2013 Jul;154(2):442-451. (Ref)
2. Fujita T, Fujita H. Efficient isolation of specific genomic regions and identification of associated proteins by engineered DNAbinding molecule-mediated chromatin immunoprecipitation (enChIP) using CRISPR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013 Sep;439(1):132-136. (Ref)
3. Liao J, Karnik R, Gu H, Ziller MJ, Clement K, et al. Targeted
disruption of DNMT1, DNMT3 and DNMT3B in human
embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet. 2015 May;47(5):469-478. (Ref)
Copyright © 2020 Boffin Access Limited.