Peer Review Support
Guidance to help authors understand peer review decisions, reviewer expectations, revision strategy, and ethical communication.
Service scope and standards
This service is designed to improve publication readiness while protecting research integrity, author responsibility, transparent disclosure, and journal policy compliance.
Guidance follows principles reflected in ICMJE recommendations and DOAJ/COPE/OASPA/WAME transparency expectations: authorship accountability, disclosure, ethical review, fee clarity, peer review transparency, copyright/licensing awareness, and responsible AI use.
What this service includes
- Decision letter interpretation
- Reviewer comment mapping
- Revision priority planning
- Response strategy support
- Resubmission readiness review
How the support works
- Review editor decision and reviewer comments.
- Classify comments by required action and complexity.
- Plan manuscript revisions and response structure.
- Check revised files before resubmission.
Ethical service principles
Peer review responses should be respectful, evidence-based, and complete.
Authors should address every reviewer and editor comment transparently.
Revision support must not misrepresent changes, data, or author responses.
Use these before requesting support
Need help with this service?
Share your manuscript stage, target journal, deadline, and support requirement. Our team can guide you toward the right service pathway.