AI Review & Academic Proofreading
Pre-submission review support to identify unclear writing, unsupported claims, citation gaps, overstatements, grammar issues, and reviewer-risk areas.
Service scope and standards
This service is designed to improve publication readiness while protecting research integrity, author responsibility, transparent disclosure, and journal policy compliance.
Guidance follows principles reflected in ICMJE recommendations and DOAJ/COPE/OASPA/WAME transparency expectations: authorship accountability, disclosure, ethical review, fee clarity, peer review transparency, copyright/licensing awareness, and responsible AI use.
What this service includes
- Claim clarity and support review
- Grammar, word choice, and academic tone proofreading
- Reviewer-risk comments before submission
- Citation gap and evidence mismatch notes
- Final polish for readability and consistency
How the support works
- Submit manuscript draft, target journal, and reference list.
- Review language, structure, claims, citations, and submission readiness.
- Receive comments, corrections, and priority revision notes.
- Author revises and performs final evidence verification.
Ethical service principles
Review feedback should help authors improve clarity and evidence alignment without changing the research meaning.
Unsupported, speculative, or overstated claims should be revised or properly evidenced.
Proofreading must not introduce new claims, fabricated references, or unverified interpretations.
Use these before requesting support
Need help with this service?
Share your manuscript stage, target journal, deadline, and support requirement. Our team can guide you toward the right service pathway.