Journal of Emerging and Rare Diseases

ISSN 2517-7397

Tissue damage in post infectious sequelae is caused by a synergism between microbial and neutrophils-derived agonists: a concern for a disregard for already published data

Isaac Ginsburg1, Erez Koren1#, Peter Vernon Van Heerden2*

1Faculty of Dental Medicine, Institute for Dental Sciences the Hebrew University Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel

2General Intensive Care Unit, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel

#Currently at Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Kfar Saba, Israel

Corresponding author

Isaac Ginsburg
Faculty of Dental Medicine
Institute for Dental Sciences the Hebrew
University Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel
E-mail: ginsburg@mail.huji.ac.il

Peter Vernon Van Heerden
General Intensive Care Unit
Hadassah University Hospital
Jerusalem, Israel
E-mail: vernon@hadassah.org.il

  • Received Date: October 04, 2017
  • Accepted Date: December 25, 2017
  • Published Date: January 03, 2018

DOI:   10.31021/jer.20181101

Article Type:  Short Communication

Manuscript ID:   JER-1-101

Publisher:   Boffin Access Limited

Volume:   1.1

Journal Type:   Open Access

Copyright:   © 2018 Manor Y.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0


Citation

Ginsburg I, Koren E, Heerden PVV. Tissue damage in post infectious sequelae is caused by asynergism between microbial and neutrophils-derived agonists: a concern for a disregard for already published data. J Emerg Rare Dis. 2018 Jan;1(1): 1:101

Abstract

Post infectious sequelae such as sepsis and septic shock are poorly understood and annually take the lives of millions over the world. Severe microbial infections caused by Gram Positive and Gram Negative bacteria and by fungi are the main causes, which are aggravated by the rapid development of antibiotic resistance. It is unfortunate that today all the clinical trials of sepsis which tested the efficacy of single antagonists failed. Sepsis was recently redefined as a synergistic multifactorial episode where no unique alarmin had been identified, which if inhibited could control the deleterious biochemical and immune immunological events characteristic of sepsis.

An apparent “breakthrough “in our understanding of sepsis pathogenicity was published in 2009 in Nature Medicine arguing that the main cause of mortality in sepsis is the release from neutrophils (PMNs) nets of highly toxic nuclear histone. This caused endothelial cell dysregulation leading to organ failure. However, this concept downplays the concept that concomitantly with the activation of PMNs, a plethora of additional proinflammatory agents is also released. These can act in synergy with histone to injure cells. Furthermore, since many additional clinical disorders not related to sepsis also reported high levels of circulating histones, this toxic agent may be considered just another marker of cell damage. The failure to treat sepsis by the administration of only single antagonists should be replaced by cocktails of appropriate anti inflammatory agents.

In 2009, two provocative articles were published in Nature Medicine suggesting that the main cause of death in sepsis is due do the release from neutrophils (PMNs) nets adhering to endothelial cells of highly bactericidal nuclear histones [1,2]. Dysregulation of endothelial cell functions then can leads to organ failure and demise of the patient. Cell damage and death could potentially be inhibited by heparin, activated protein C and by antibodies to histones [2]. However, these exciting and promising papers were soon followed by publications suggesting that high levels of circulating nuclear histones were also detected in other clinical disorders unrelated to sepsis, hinting that histones might not be the sole alarmin active agent in sepsis pathogenicity [3-9]. This assumption is based on a recent suggestion which re-defined sepsis as a multi-factorial synergistic phenomenon, where no single alarmin is generated which if neutralized successfully, might prevent the aftermath of severe microbial infections [9]. We also previously suggested that histone may not be a “unique evil alarmin” agent but only an additional “member of the gang” [8].

It is conceivable that concomitantly with PMN activation, consequent upon adherence to endothelial cell, the PMNs also release into the surrounding media a burst of NADPHactivated oxidants such as superoxide, nitric oxide (NO), peroxynitrite, HOCl and highly cationic peptides such as LL37, elastase, cathepsins C and G, many acid hydrolases and also TH1 cytokines probably have a role in the pathogenesis of cell damage in inflammation [10-27]. These toxic agents most probably do not act alone but in synergy (a crosstalk) with nuclear cationic histone and with additional cationic peptides to injure cells. Furthermore, the role played by the microbial cell-wall components LPS, lipoteichoic acid (LTA) and peptidoglycan (PPG) released following bacteriolysis induced either by antibiotics or by certain cationic peptides and their interactions with PMN products have not been clearly considered in the numerous publications on the role of histones in sepsis published in the literature [28-30].

It is therefore enigmatic and concerning that screening no less than 52 publications via Google Scholar and PUBMED, published since 2009, regarding the role of histones in the pathophysiology of sepsis revealed a disregard for a large number of publications on these subjects [10-30].

Here, potentially, non-anticoagulant heparin may abolish not only histones’ cationic charge toxic effect but also the synergism between histones and the various other pro-inflammatory agents generated by activated PMNs [31].

Disregarding this synergistic conceptual approach is a serious mishap/flaw that may have halted advanced approaches to sepsis prevention and effective therapy of sepsis. This concept is also critical in view of the fact that actually all the clinical trials of sepsis conduced to date, which utilized only single antagonists have failed [32,33]. However, the suggestion made to replace single antagonists with cocktails of appropriate ant-inflammatory agents has not gained/ heeded any clinical interest to date [34]. After all, looking at similar models, today we successfully use cocktails of antagonists to treat the auto-immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), tuberculosis and also malignancies. Why do we continue to pin our hopes on single antagonists when treating a multifactorial complex process like sepsis? [9].

Taken together, it is hoped that accepting the synergism concept of cell damage in post-infectious sequelae such as sepsis be reconsidered and that new approaches to sepsis treatment be established [35,36].

In conclusion, a cautionary comment

It is very obvious that today patients usually arrive at the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) too late when all the “horses have already left the stable” allowing the immune system to induce organ failure [37,38]. Novel means of detecting early markers of sepsis should be available to every family physicians office and every family physicians office and to recognize the severity of the illness. The inability to successfully control the deleterious aftermath of severe incurable microbial infections places sepsis and septic shock in the category of one of the least understood human disorders and may be categorized as an orphan disorder which necessitates a reassessment of our clinical approaches to dealing with post infectious sequelae.

References

  1. Chaput C, Zychlinsky A (2009) Sepsis: the dark side of histones. Nat med 15: 1245-1246. doi: 10.1038/nm1109-1245 (Ref.)
  2. Xu J, Zhang X, Pelayo R, Monestier M, Ammollo, et al. (2009) Extracellular histones are major mediators of death in sepsis. Nat med 15: 1318-1321. doi: 10.1038/nm.2053 (Ref.)
  3. Alhamdi Y, Toh CH (2016) The role of extracellular histones in haematological disorders. Br J Haematol 173: 805-811. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14077 (Ref.)
  4. Hirose T, Hamaguchi S, Matsumoto N, Irisawa T, Seki M, et al. (2014) Presence of neutrophil extracellular traps and citrullinated histone H3 in the bloodstream of critically ill patients. PloS One 9: e111755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111755 (Ref.)
  5. Ward PA, Grailer JJ (2014) Acute lung injury and the role of histones. Translational respiratory medicine 2: 1 (Ref.)
  6. Zhang Y, Wen Z, Guan L, Jiang P, Gu T, et al. (2015) Extracellular histones play an inflammatory role in acid aspiration-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology 122: 127- 139. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000429 (Ref.)
  7. Bosmann M, Grailer JJ, Ruemmler R, Russkamp NF, Zetoune FS, et al. (2013) Extracellular histones are essential effectors of C5aRand C5L2-mediated tissue damage and inflammation in acute lung injury. FASEB J 27: 5010-5021. doi: 10.1096/fj.13-236380 (Ref.)
  8. Ginsburg I, Koren E, Varani J, Kohen R (2016) Nuclear histones: major virulence factors or just additional early sepsis markers? A comment. Inflammopharmacology 24: 287-289. doi: 10.1007/ s10787-016-0279-y (Ref.)
  9. Koren E, Ginsburg I (2015) Synergistic aspects to explain the pathophysiology of sepsis and septic shock-an opinion. J Infect Dis Ther 3: 254. doi:10.4172/2332-0877.1000254 (Ref.)
  10. Ginsburg I, Kohen R (1995) Synergistic effects among oxidants, membrane-damaging agents, fatty acids, proteinases, and xenobiotics: killing of epithelial cells and release of arachidonic acid. Inflammation 19: 101-118 (Ref.)
  11. Ginsburg I, Kohen R (1995) Cell damage in inflammatory and infectious sites might involve a coordinated “cross-talk” among oxidants, microbial haemolysins and ampiphiles, cationic proteins, phospholipases, fatty acids, proteinases and cytokines (an overview). Free radic res 22: 489-517 (Ref.)
  12. Ginsburg I, van Heerden PV, Koren E (2017) From amino acids polymers, antimicrobial peptides, and histones, to their possible role in the pathogenesis of septic shock: a historical perspective. J Inflamm Res 10: 7-15. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S126150 (Ref.)
  13. Ginsburg I, Ward PA, Varani J (1989) Lysophosphatides enhance superoxide responses of stimulated human neutrophils. Inflammation 13: 163-174 (Ref.)
  14. Henson PM, Johnston RB, Jr. (1987) Tissue injury in inflammation. Oxidants, proteinases, and cationic proteins. J Clin Invest 79: 669- 674. doi: 10.1172/JCI112869 (Ref.)
  15. Lehr HA, Arfors KE (1994) Mechanisms of tissue damage by leukocytes. Curr Opin Hematol 1: 92-99 (Ref.)
  16. Lichtenstein AK, Ganz T, Selsted ME, Lehrer RI (1988) Synergistic cytolysis mediated by hydrogen peroxide combined with peptide defensins. Cell immunol 114: 104-116 (Ref.)
  17. Rodell TC, Cheronis JC, Repine JE (1988) Endothelial cell xanthine oxidase-derived toxic oxygen metabolites contribute to acute lung injury from neutrophil elastase. Chest 93: 146S. doi: 10.1378/ chest.93.3_Supplement.146S (Ref.)
  18. Varani J, Ginsburg I, Schuger L, Gibbs DF, Bromberg J, et al. (1989) Endothelial cell killing by neutrophils. Synergistic interaction of oxygen products and proteases. Am J Pathol 135: 435-438 (Ref.)
  19. Anderson BO, Brown JM, Harken AH (1991) Mechanisms of neutrophil-mediated tissue injury. J Surg Res 51: 170-179 (Ref.)
  20. Dan P, Nizan D, Dagan A, Ginsburg I, Yedgar S (1996) H2O2 degrades cell surface proteoglycans and exposes the cells to lysis by phospholipase A2: A novel mechanism for cell damage in inflammatory processes. FEBS Lett 383: 57-78. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00227-X (Ref.)
  21. Ginsburg I, Gibbs DF, Schuger L, Johnson KJ, Ryan US, et al. (1989) Vascular endothelial cell killing by combinations of membrane-active agents and hydrogen peroxide. Free Radic Biol Med 7: 369-376 (Ref.)
  22. Ginsburg I, Misgav R, Pinson A, Varani J, Ward PA, et al. (1992) Synergism among oxidants, proteinases, phospholipases, microbial hemolysins, cationic proteins, and cytokines. Inflammation 16: 519-538 (Ref.)
  23. Ginsburg I, Mitra RS, Gibbs DF, Varani J, Kohen R (1993) Killing of endothelial cells and release of arachidonic acid. Inflammation 17: 295-319 (Ref.)
  24. Klebanoff SJ, Kinsella MG, Wight TN (1993) Degradation of endothelial cell matrix heparan sulfate proteoglycan by elastase and the myeloperoxidase-H2O2-chloride system. Am J Pathol 143: 907-917 (Ref.)
  25. Smith JA (1994) Neutrophils, host defense, and inflammation: a double-edged sword. J Leukoc Biol 56: 672-686 (Ref.)
  26. Ginsburg I (1998) Could synergistic interactions among reactive oxygen species, proteinases, membrane-perforating enzymes, hydrolases, microbial hemolysins and cytokines be the main cause of tissue damage in infectious and inflammatory conditions? Med hypotheses 51: 337-346. (Ref.)
  27. Hampton MB, Kettle AJ, Winterbourn CC (1998) Inside the neutrophil phagosome: oxidants, myeloperoxidase, and bacterial killing. Blood 92: 3007-3017 (Ref.)
  28. Ginsburg I (2002) The role of bacteriolysis in the pathophysiology of inflammation, infection and post-infectious sequelae. APMIS 110: 753-770. (Ref.)
  29. Horn DL, Morrison DC, Opal SM, Silverstein R, Visvanathan K, et al. (2000) What are the microbial components implicated in the pathogenesis of sepsis? Report on a symposium. Clin Infect Dis 31: 851-858. (Ref.)
  30. Hurley JC (1992) Antibiotic-induced release of endotoxin: a reappraisal. Clin Infect Dis 15: 840-854. (Ref.)
  31. Wildhagen KC, Garcia de Frutos P, Reutelingsperger CP, Schrijver R, Aresté C, et al. (2014) Non anticoagulant heparin prevents histone-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro and improves survival in sepsis. Blood 123: 1098-1101. doi: 10.1182/ blood-2013-07-514984. (Ref.)
  32. Opal SM (2014) The current understanding of sepsis and research priorities for the future. Virulence 5: 1-3. doi: 10.4161/ viru.26803 (Ref.)
  33. Opal SM, Dellinger RP, Vincent J-L, Masur H, Angus DC (2014) The next generation of sepsis trials: What’s next after the demise of recombinant human activated Protein C? Crit Care Med 42: 1714- 1721. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000325 (Ref.)
  34. Ginsburg I (1999) Multi-drug strategies are necessary to inhibit the synergistic mechanism causing tissue damage and organ failure in post infectious sequelae. Inflammopharmacology 7: 207-217. doi: 10.1007/s10787-999-0004-1 (Ref.)
  35. Angus DC, Van Der Poll T (2013) Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 369: 840-851. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208623. (Ref.)
  36. van der Poll T, Opal SM (2008) Host-pathogen interactions in sepsis. Lancet Infect dis 8: 32-43. doi: 10.1016/S1473- 3099(07)70265-7 (Ref.)
  37. Graetz TJ, Hotchkiss RS (2017) Sepsis: Preventing organ failure in sepsis - the search continues. Nat Rev Nephrol 13: 5-6. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.171 (Ref.)
  38. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, et al. (2017) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 43: 304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6 (Ref.)